Cases 71 - 80 of 1,115
FLAMER v. LYNN et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER
Defendant:
LT. LYNN, MUHAMMED and SERGEANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAMER v. S. WILLIAMS
as 2:2021cv05671
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY FLAMER
Defendant:
S. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWAN v. KOSTURA et al
as 5:2021cv05557
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COWAN
Defendant:
JAMES C. KOSTURA, MARK T. BARTHOLOMEW, JOHN HARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atanacio-Reyes v. Ayers et al
as 1:2021cv02075
Plaintiff:
Carlos Atanacio-Reyes
Defendant:
Erin Ayers, Jeffrey Burkhart, Nathaniel Kowalski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. YATRON et al
as 5:2021cv05348
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE M. EVANS
Defendant:
JUDGE PAUL M. YATRON, OFFICER RYAN SHUTT, OFFICER SUPERVISOR DAVID COSLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv05076
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Eden
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DENNIS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv04849
Petitioner:
JEFFREY DENNIS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT K. BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez et al v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2021cv01819
Plaintiff:
George Ivan Lopez, Darien Houser, Gerald Watkins and others
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLAMER v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2021cv04326
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER
Defendant:
G. BRADLEY, MS. EMMIT, LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
