Cases 71 - 80 of 109
Walker v. Stengel et al
as 1:2014cv01984
Plaintiff:
Vernon Walker
Defendant:
S. Stengel, L. Rumbles, C. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denegal v. Brazelton et al
as 1:2014cv01410
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Denegal
Defendant:
P. D. Brazelton, K. D. Geringer, J. D. Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Gay et al
as 4:2014cv00532
Petitioner:
Fred Allen Madden
Respondent:
David Gay, David Canidate, K. D. William and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Ketner v. Hoosier Truck & Trailer Servic, et al
as 14-1486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. KETNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOSIER TRUCK & TRAILER SERVICES and KATHY SCHULTETI, doing busniess as KAS INVESTMENTS LLC, doing business as K & d CONTRACTORS LLC, doing business as SOUTHSIDE HARLEY DAVIDSON
Daniel Ketner v. Kathy Shuleti
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. KETNER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY A. SHULETI, doing business as KAS INVESTMENT LLC, doing business as K&D CONTRACTORS LLC, doing business as SOUTHSIDE HARLEY DAVIDSON
Claiborne v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2012cv01257
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gerald Claiborne
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley State Prison, M. C. Davis, K. D. Geringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Vargas et al
as 1:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
Santee Joseph Blair
Defendant:
K Vargas, J. Gibbs, T. Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry T. Whitehead v. McDonald et al
as 5:2012cv00805
Respondent:
K. D. Harris and Mr McDonald
Petitioner:
Harry T. Whitehead
Whitehead v. McDonald et al
as 3:2012cv01148
Petitioner:
Harry T. Whitehead
Respondent:
McDonald and K. D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgos v. Trimble et al
as 1:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuel Burgos
Defendant:
Robert H. Trimble, K. D. Geringer and J. M. Woodend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
