Cases 71 - 80 of 1,639
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Medina v. Martinez et al
as 1:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Robert Medina, Jr.
Defendant:
Gustavo Martinez, J. Alvarez, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Barth v. S. Borbe, et al
as 23-15879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DAMON BARTH
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BORBE, Correctional Officer, LOCKWOOD, Correctional Officer, TOURE, Correctional Officer and others
William Medina v. Sal Aprile, et al
as 23-2055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM MEDINA
Debtor / Appellee:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellee:
DET. SAL APRILE, SGT. ERIC STAUFFER, DAVID J. MUSSEL and others
Defendant:
ERIC STAUFFER
Medina-Morales v. Martinez Jr
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Carlos Medina-Morales
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv04135
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Caley et al
as 1:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Delano Medina
Respondent:
Jennifer Murphy, Colorado Parole Board, Eddie Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
