Cases 71 - 80 of 300
PHILLIPS v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2019cv00382
Defendant:
NURSE MURRAY, LIEUTENANT S.A. GATTO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv06055
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barclay v. Stabley et al
as 4:2019cv02054
Defendant:
Lee, Campbell, McHenry and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Barclay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEECK v. SERODY et al
as 2:2019cv05061
Defendant:
C/O DR PHILLIPS, C/O MR. EBOWA, WARDEN MR. BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
MR BRANDON DEECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLERY v. DR. RONALD PHILLIPS et al
as 2:2019cv05064
Plaintiff:
RASHEEM TILLERY
Defendant:
DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, DAVID BYRNES, MARIEL TRIMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. BETANCOURT et al
as 2:2019cv04670
Defendant:
JEFFREY WITHELDER, DR. PHILLIPS, MARIEL TRIMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAR A. GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04580
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PREACHER v. CORRECT CARE SERVICES
as 2:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES, DR. KROSS, COUNSELOR MICHAEL STELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR PHILLIPS et al v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03822
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR PHILLIPS and PHYLLIS PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DR. JOHN DOE, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., HANNAH JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.