Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Stewart v. Sorensen
as 2:2011cv01188
Petitioner: Calvin Paul Stewart
Respondent: Dennis Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Sorensen
as 3:2011cv01125
Plaintiff: Dale Bernard Green
Defendant: Chris Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Michael Michuda v. State of MN Board of Public, et al
as 11-3261
Plaintiff - Appellant: Stephen Michael Michuda
Defendant - Appellee: State of MN Board of Public Defense, John Stuart, State of MN Public Defender's Office and others
Muhammad We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04889
Plaintiff: Ansar El Muhammad
Defendant: G. J. Ahern, K. Jackson, Posedel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Sorensen
as 2:2011cv00900
Petitioner: Stephen James Walker
Respondent: Dennis Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muhammad v. Ahern et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04434
Plaintiff: Ansar El Muhammad
Defendant: Gregory J. Ahern, K. Jackson, Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Ahern et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04358
Plaintiff: Ansar El Muhammad
Defendant: Gregory Ahern, K. Jackson, Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Utah Board of Pardons et al
as 2:2011cv00466
Petitioner: Ronald Lee Faulkner
Respondent: Utah Board of Pardons, State of Utah and Dennis Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michuda v. State of MN Board of Public Defense et al
as 0:2011cv01031
Plaintiff: Stephen Michael Michuda
Defendant: State of MN Board of Public Defense, John Stuart, State of MN Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Allred v. BOP Northeast Regionsl Counsel, et al
as 11-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHAWN ALLRED
Defendant - Appellee: BOP NORTHEAST REGIONSL COUNSEL, J.L. NORWOOD, Warden Regional Director, RONNIE HOLT, Warden and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?