Cases 71 - 80 of 918
Standingwater v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Terry Standingwater
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Jerry Don Rhodes
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Edward S Downs
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Muskogee County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Scott Nero
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Maxwell v. State of Oklahoma Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
James Henry Maxwell, Jr and S Claus
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma Attorney General and Wagoner County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rigsby v. Marler et al
as 6:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Rigsby
Defendant:
FNU Marler, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Great State of Oklhoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Vincent H. Small
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wonsch v. Crow
as 22-6040
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT V. WONSCH
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and SCOTT CROW
Harcourt v. Dennis et al
as 5:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
William David Harcourt
Respondent:
Chad Dennis and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McFarland v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Robert Earl McFarland, IV
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
