Cases 71 - 80 of 72,452
Don Lippert, et al v. Quentin Tanner, et al
as 24-1998
Plaintiff:
DON LIPPERT, WILLIAM E. BASSETT, MILAM MARTIN and others
Defendant:
QUENTIN TANNER, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Kevin Bure v. C. Gann, et al
as 24-1990
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BURE
Defendant:
C. GANN, ERIN WILLIAMS, JASON SMILEY, Warden and others
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oren Stacey
Defendant:
William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Frederick Matthews
Defendant:
Jim Casey, Stacy Oaks, William Blackerby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Tong et al
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
William Tong, Sandra Arenas, Edward Miner Lamont, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00591
Petitioner:
William Carl Sanders
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colaizzo v. Saks fifth Ave et al
as 2:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Johnathen Colaizzo
Defendant:
Saks fifth Ave and Corey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
Christopher William Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curtis Williams v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-11932
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANDREW WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, TYRONE OLIVER, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE and others
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
