Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Pasture v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
as 7:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Pasture
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail, O'Bryant and Eric Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Bryant, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen McClellan
Defendant:
Captain Bryant and Captain Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Teal et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Stephone Lvon Marshall
Defendant:
Sgt. Teal, Capt. Strickland, Capt. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asturias v. Smith et al
as 4:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Asturias
Defendant:
Gerold Smith, Zaner, Scott Hassell and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Mikel Hammonds
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Derrick Carter, Kenneth Sconyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanding v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Eric Blanding
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Mr. Carter, Karla Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linares v. Etowah County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv02120
Plaintiff:
Rafael Alberto LLovera Linares
Defendant:
Etowah County Jail, Mike O'Bryant, Scott Hassell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Bailey et al
as 7:2014cv01732
Plaintiff:
Ambrienne Barsai Moss
Defendant:
Eric Bailey, Cunningham, Martin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truss v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Quentin Truss
Defendant:
Dominic Jones, Larry Peavy, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. Alabama Board of Pardon & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Guthrie
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon & Paroles, Cynthia Dillard, Eddie Cook, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
