Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Ollison et al v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown, David McDaniel, Loydale Kirven and others
Defendant:
FNU Gallegos, Curry County Detention Center, Trinity Food Groups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2018cv00983
Plaintiff:
Bernard Parson
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratigan v. Curry County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00949
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center and Curry County Detention Center Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ratigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2018cv00694
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Curry County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Willie Greene and Willie C. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. North Bend Medical Center et al
as 1:2017cv01525
Defendant:
Curry County Jail, North Bend Medical Center and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Denice Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Curry County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01440
Defendant:
Curry County Jail and Nurse Curry County Jail
Plaintiff:
Denice Shala Joy Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Curry County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Josh Davila
Defendant:
Curry County Jail Facility and Anthony Parrara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davila v. Curry County Jail et al
as 6:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Josh Davila
Defendant:
Curry County Jail and Anthony Parrara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Chris Ramirez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirven v. Maples et al
as 2:2016cv01361
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven
Defendant:
Matt Maples, Curry County Detention Center and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
