Cases 81 - 90 of 1,167
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONAWAY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
JOHN LEE CONAWAY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. THE STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ET AL
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE HARRIS
Defendant:
THE STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBIN PENDERGRAFT and SHARON R HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PULLIAM v. USA
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
JODY LEE PULLIAM, JR.
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. Vernado et al
as 5:2023ct03026
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Martin, III
Defendant:
Shakena Vernado, Sgt. Summer and James D. Diggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. USA
as 1:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE FORD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Joyner v. Turley et al
as 5:2023ct03019
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L. Joyner and Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Captain Turley, Sergeant Riddick, Daniel Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. BOP
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEE GRIFFITH
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Furr v. Williams et al
as 5:2022ct03454
Plaintiff:
Julian Terell Furr
Defendant:
Vivian Williams, Jefferey Jerinkin, Captain Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
