Cases 81 - 90 of 200
David Meyers v. E. Fisher, et al
as 14-4820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNSELOR E. FISHER, A.D. TOLLACKSON, Housing Unit Manager, TARA KLEMBACA and others
Espinosa v. Bannister et al
as 3:2014cv00668
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, James G. Cox, William Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv01605
Defendant:
Romee Aranas, Brain Connett, Catherine Cortez Maestro and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Nevada Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00502
Defendant:
Dr. Arana, Dr. Mar and Nevada Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Mar et al
as 3:2014cv00499
Defendant:
Bannister, Garner, Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCabe v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2014cv00346
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Arianas, Warden Isidro Baca, Doctor Robert Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Mar et al
as 3:2014cv00290
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Linda Klump, David A. Mar and others
Plaintiff:
John Oliver Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Keith et al
as 1:2014cv00993
Plaintiff:
Michael J Hodges
Defendant:
Tim Keith, D Mar, Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
La'Mar Williams v. Billy Gene Williams et al
as 5:2014cv00703
Defendant:
Billy Gene Williams and Billy Gene Williams
Plaintiff:
La'Mar Williams
Cox v. NDOC et al
as 3:2014cv00145
Defendant:
(Asst.)(Ms.) Luce, (Ms.) Young, (N) Margaret and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Steve Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
