Cases 81 - 90 of 124
Joshua Dalke v. Beth Oh et al
as 2:2018cv10613
Defendant:
Doe 1, J. Parga, Beth Oh and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dalke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry #659823 v. Lesatz et al
as 2:2018cv00222
Defendant:
Chung Oh, Unknown Rajala, Daniel Lesatz and others
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Perry #659823
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Woods et al
as 2:2018cv00193
Defendant:
Unknown Velma, Unknown Phillips, Unknown Dalotts and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Hill et al
as 2:2018cv00129
Defendant:
Unknown Bauer, Aaron Jeffries, Nicole Sunberg and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Woods et al
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Unknown Huhta, Unknown Pesola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchem v. Sheriff, Butler County, OH et al
as 1:2018cv00426
Plaintiff:
Mbiya Mitchem
Defendant:
Sheriff, Butler County, OH and Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Corizon Correctional Health Care et al
as 2:2018cv11608
Plaintiff:
L.T. Tucker
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Health Care, Kristine Nyquist and Chung Oh
Edward Williams, et al v. Donald Schismenos, et al
as 17-3786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BRENT WILLIAMS and THERESA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD SCHISMENOS, Badge No. 950, Individually and in his official capacity, JESSIE LEESER, Badge No. 1030, Individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF AKRON, OH
Espinoza v. Cuenca et al
as 3:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
Joseph Espinoza
Defendant:
Miguel Cuenca, Orange County, CA and Christine Oh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Ferguson v. City of South Euclid, Ohio
as 17-3433
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, OH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
