Cases 81 - 90 of 183
Garrett v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Quality Corrections Health Care, Officer K Boird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00457
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Powell
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, John Samaniego, Quality Corrections Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledbetter v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kenndrick Ledbetter
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Newton, Bratcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv03017
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Burns
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Dodson, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2016cv02915
Plaintiff:
Kevinee M. Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Morris et al
as 2:2016cv02887
Plaintiff:
Stephan Richardson
Defendant:
Morris, Boyd and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLISON v. SHELBY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER
as 1:2016cv03029
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, SHELBY COUNTY JAIL and SHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
TROY M. TILLISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Shelby County Municipality et al
as 2:2016cv02835
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquette Myers
Defendant:
Shelby County Municipality, Interpol, Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv02819
Plaintiff:
Travis Tate
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and K. Hollister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 2:2016cv02787
Plaintiff:
Donyel Thomas
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Shelby County and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
