Cases 81 - 90 of 31,860
Thompson v. McGibbon et al
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Arnold C Thompson
Defendant:
CO McGibbon, Capt Ross, CPS Grenier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Washington v. Holder et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine T Washington
Defendant:
Barret Holder and Ludi Leitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Lee A. v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv21879
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Williams
Defendant:
J. Lee, T. Anderson, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Lunford v. Leon et al
as 1:2024cv04166
Plaintiff:
Darren A Lunford
Defendant:
Pedro Leon, S. Miller, T. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaya v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera Anaya
Defendant:
V. Vasquez, T. Harley, Case Management Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ary v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Earnest T Ary
Defendant:
Nolen Bass, A Johnson, Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
