Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Holley-Chambers v. Noble County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Carwin Holley-Chambers
Defendant:
Noble County Jail, Jenny Cummins and Max Webber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Bowman et al
as 3:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Isaac Hicks
Defendant:
Bowman, Robert E Carter, James Basinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDESTY v. HILL et al
as 1:2021cv01129
Defendant:
JENNY REWERTS, CARLA ROSSELOT, Sgt. S. HILL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO HARDESTY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardesty v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Jenny Rewerts, Carla Rosselot, Duane Alsip and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Leo Hardesty, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, Rob Carter, John Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Vernell Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MADISON COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE/WORK-RELEASE CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, SCOTT C. MELLINGER, MASON BRIZENDINE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTON JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNNELL v. GIBSON
as 1:2018cv02646
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BUNNELL
Defendant:
JENNY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNNELL v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2018cv00772
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BUNNELL
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, GIBSON and JENNY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DEARBORN COUNTY et al
as 4:2018cv00033
Defendant:
CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, CONTRACTED MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCOTT JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARKINS v. KREINHOPP et al
as 1:2017cv02426
Defendant:
DANIEL BAKER, STEVE COURTER, TRAVIS DAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS EDWARD HARKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
