Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pulling et al v. Arms et al
as 7:2020cv00482
Plaintiff:
Angel Cartagena, Lion J. Ross, Justin Evans and others
Defendant:
Dr. Parham, Dr. William Lee, A. Lovell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whorley et al v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brummett, Felipe Franco, Dwight Horton and others
Defendant:
Tori Raiford, Brian J. Moran, Eric Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Henry Ponton, S. Fletcher, Deborah Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaborn v. Va. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, H. Scott Richeson, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jesovha Octavius Seaborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisholm v. Whaley et al
as 7:2019cv00591
Defendant:
Sgt. Coleman, Lt. Whaley, Officer Hurley and others
Plaintiff:
Tori Chisholm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisholm v. Elam
as 7:2019cv00353
Plaintiff:
Tori Chisholm
Defendant:
Marcus Elam, B.T. Mitchell, Robert W. Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00514
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Tori Raiford, C/O Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tory v. Davis et al
as 7:2018cv00393
Plaintiff:
Michael E Tory, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown, McGlothin, Lt. B. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
