Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Popoca #242515 v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv02213
Petitioner:
Isaac V Popoca
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloan et al v. Cyprus Amax Mineral Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Eli Sloan, Isaac Sloan, Chris Sloan and others
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Mineral Corporation, Dodge Phelps Corporation, Freeport McMoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren et al v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv02200
Plaintiff:
Diamond Warren and Robert Yates
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa, County of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Eller et al
as 3:2022cv08083
Plaintiff:
Candace Williams and Jonathan Linzy
Defendant:
Daniel Eller, Cody Skrarek, Perry Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Target Corporation
as 2:2020cv01814
Plaintiff:
Isaac J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00368
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Corizon Health Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Isaac Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silversmith v. USA
as 2:2020cv01421
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Isaac Steven Silversmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00847
Petitioner:
Isaac Jude Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortega v. Maricopa County Durango Jail et al
as 2:2019cv02057
Defendant:
Maricopa County Durango Jail and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
Isaac Anthonio Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00922
Defendant:
Unknown Hudson, Unknown Parties, Unknown Zaragoza and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac J Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
