Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2022cv00295
Petitioner:
Angela Marie Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Torres v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00193
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 5, C.O. Unknown Lacey, Commissioner Pelecia E. Hall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Alex Ramirez Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. McAleenan et al
as 5:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SHAWN GILLIS and others
Plaintiff:
Josep Ramirez Alvarez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00785
Petitioner:
Vincent Anthony Ramirez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00050
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Sergio Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Forrest County Correction Officers, Forrest Co. Jail and Medical Staff
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez-Ramirez v. Kelly et al
as 5:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Hector Dominguez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Kelly and Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jimenez-Pedroza et al v. Kelly et al
as 5:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Jimenez-Pedroza and Hector Dominguez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Kelly and Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Ramirez v. Balla et al
as 5:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Noe Rodriguez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Balla and Stephen D. Julian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castillo-Ramirez v. USA
as 1:2017cv00180
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ernesto Castillo-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
