Cases 1 - 10 of 472
Velasquez-Gomez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Mario Velasquez-Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Giron (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Jose S. Giron
Defendant:
Stancil and Jeremiah Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vinyard v. Konrad et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Joshuwa R. Vinyard
Defendant:
Konrad, Arana, Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Felix v. Cazores, et al.
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Tylo Jerome Felix, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Cazores, J. Smotherman, D. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Chad Jones
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Jessica Krueger, Jeremiah Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hernandez-Velasquez v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Jeison Hernandez-Velasquez
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
VELASQUEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
JORGE MARIO VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Velasquez-Jimenez
as 24-10019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cristobal Velasquez-Jimenez, also known as Arturo Cervantes
Walker v. Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2 et al
as 5:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Walker
Defendant:
Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2, FNU Swain, FNU Summerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Amaya v. Saint Lucie County Jail
as 2:2023cv14397
Plaintiff:
David A. Velasquez Amaya
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
