Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Nicodemo DiPietro v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 23-1365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
DIPIETRO v. BLACK et al
as 4:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIPIETRO
Defendant:
Warden REGAN BLACK, DR RICHARD ROBINSON, HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert DiPietro v. Laretha Lockhart
as 22-10609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Defendant / Appellee:
LARETHA URETT LOCKHART
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 3:2020cv20424
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, ANTHONY DIPIETRO and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 1:2020cv09404
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER K. CAIN, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiPietro v. Agyeri et al
as 1:2020cv02645
Defendant:
Terrell Bond, Charlotte Hall, Tonicia Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ralph DiPietro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. LOCKHART et al
as 4:2020cv00035
Defendant:
FARMER, SHANEQUA MUSSA, LOCKHART and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. COOPER et al
as 4:2019cv00113
Defendant:
NINA COOPER, MUSSA, MARY TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. LEITH
as 1:2019cv13891
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIPIETRO v. WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2019cv12709
Respondent:
WARDEN OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN OF THE SALEM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
