Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Elzey et al v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey, Kortney Elzey, Dustin Havens, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton and 24/7 Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Spann v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Carren Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Spann v. Franke et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Carren Franke, Jeremy K. Nix, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTER v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv02117
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HESTER
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HESTER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
CHAD T. HESTER
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEYERS v. DOURGHTY et al
as 1:2020cv01273
Defendant:
CHRIS DOURGTHY, RYAN JUSTICE and DANIEL HESTER
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEJUAN MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOUGHTY v. DUGGER et al
as 1:2017cv04470
Defendant:
ARAMARK, JODY DUGGER and BRANDEN HESTER
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO DOUGHTY
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTER v. BUSSE et al
as 1:2011cv00285
Defendant:
DOUG BARNES, T. BEAN, JERRY BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDUL-WADOOD et al v. BUSSE et al
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
LOKMAR Y. ABDUL-WADOOD, JAMES J. BARRETT, DAVE CALLOWAY and others
Defendant:
DOUG BARNES, T. BEAN, JERRY BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. HALLMEN et al
as 4:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ LAMOUNTE SMITH
Defendant:
BRIAN HALLMEN, CARRIE WELDER, MICHEL N. CROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
