Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Akins v. McNeal et al
as 4:2022cv01288
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Akins
Defendant:
McNeal, Does Chief of Police and Officers, Maumelle Police Department and Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reign v. Barton et al
as 2:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Reign
Defendant:
Roosevelt Barton, Tevin Smith, Dennis Ugbaji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raper v. Gober et al
as 4:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
James M Roper, Jr and James M Raper, Jr
Defendant:
Drew County Detention Center, Mark Gober, Does All Guards and Employees of Drew County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Slaughter et al
as 4:2020cv00811
Defendant:
Dillard, Bryant Slaughter, Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jarmer Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2020cv00431
Defendant:
Does Administrator, Nurse, Sergeant B-Shift, and Lieutenant B-Shift at Pulaski County Detention Center and Bill Higgins
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D Akins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunahue v. Andrews et al
as 2:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Jakyree Wynn, Ladarius Williams, Kathy Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brazell v. Barden et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Dycus, Kroger, Kuylar Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Brazell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Bardon et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Defendant:
James Dycus, R Bardon, Halway and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Deshaun Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Andrews et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Defendant:
Andrews, James Dycus, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Deshaun Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
