Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYSON v. SHIVER
as 3:2023cv14417
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRYSON
Defendant:
J SHIVER, DONALD LEAVINS, J D PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. David et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josh Fleming
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Ashly Nichols, Amanda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. STOUT et al
as 2:2020cv00241
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SMITH
Defendant:
STONEBRAKER, JULIE STOUT, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Ripper
as 5:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
Tracy Garrett
Defendant:
Ripper, L.T. Eric Ripper and Nurse Amanda Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Bourbon County Regional Detention Center et al
as 5:2020cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jason Dexter Mays, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelia Gant, Bourbon County Regional Detention Center, Wesley Burberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Bourbon County Regional Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jason Dexter Mays, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelia Gant, Bourbon County Regional Detention Center, Wesley Burberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Harris v. Henderson et al
as 3:2019cv00660
Plaintiff:
Sidney Harris
Defendant:
Amanda Smith, Jeffery Dennison, Shawn Brasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glivar v. Weld County et al
as 1:2019cv00832
Respondent:
Colorado Institute of Mental Health at Pueblo, Z. Poulsen, Amanda Smith and others
Petitioner:
Meigra Marie Glivar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Spoden v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01403
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Amanda Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Spoden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
