Cases 1 - 10 of 21
FLYNN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
DEANDRE FLYNN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLYNN v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00581
Petitioner:
DEANDRE' FLYNN
Respondent:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newsom v. Attorney General of Indiana
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Newsom
Defendant:
Attorney General of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLATO v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
ROBERT J. PLATO, JR.
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Indiana Correctional Industries et al
as 3:2020cv01010
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Indiana Correctional Industries, IN the State of and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 1:2020cv02269
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00504
Defendant:
Appeals Court of Indiana, LaPorte Circuit Court, Indiana State of and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2020cv00876
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY FOR IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON EVERETT ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
