Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
Angel Hernandez and Angel Santiago Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Mueller et al
as 1:2023cv05661
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
Susan Mueller, Kathleen Mantaro, Mikhail Gusman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2021cv02237
Petitioner:
Eduardo Angel Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bishop v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Bishop, II
Defendant:
USP Marion, Warden Sproul, Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01491
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oliver v. Madsen et al
as 5:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Oliver
Defendant:
S. Mora, H, Madsen, Angel Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv08173
Plaintiff:
Spencer Jackson, Wayne Stewart, Peter Allen and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Mantaro, MD, John Doe #2, MD, Jon Miller, MD and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. The United States of America
as 3:2018cv00144
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Hernandez
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miguel Hernandez-Abraham v. USA
as 18-11162
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ-ABRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Angel Hernandez v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 17-3678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
