Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brown #367927 v. King
as 1:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown #367927 v. American Civil Liberties Union Prison Project Washington D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927, Islamic Ali and RESTRICTED FILER Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927
Defendant:
American Civil Liberties Union Prison Project Washington D.C., New York Chapter, Michigan Chapter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antrell Brown v. MI, et al
as 22-1136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRELL VONICQUE BROWN, aka Islamic Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANA NESSEL and others
Antrell Brown v. MI, et al
as 22-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRELL VONICQUE BROWN, Islamic Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as Corizon Personnel and others
Brown #367927 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927 and Islamic Ali
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #3, Unknown Elbodi, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 9:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown, Islamic Ali and Antrell Vonicque Brown
Defendant:
Elbodi, Unit Chief Brett Coney, Danyelle Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown #367927 v. Horton
as 2:2019cv00174
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Petitioner:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927 and Antrell Vonique Brown #367927
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown #367927 v. Parish
as 1:2018cv00974
Respondent:
Les Parish
Petitioner:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown #367927 v. Burt
as 1:2018cv00716
Respondent:
Sherry L. Burt
Petitioner:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
