Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Blackwell v. People of the United States of California
as 3:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Costello Blackwell
Defendant:
People of the United States of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Welk v. CA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA. Dept. of Corrections, Robert Mayes, Mejorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Blackwell v. Tsui et al
as 2:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Bradley Blackwell
Defendant:
David Tsui, James Brown, Brian Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2021cv08545
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Shelton Adams, Robert Blackwell and others
Petitioner:
William Pardue
Defendant:
Ronald R. Patterson, State of California, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Burton v. Burton et al
as 2:2020cv02395
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Burton
Defendant:
Robert Burton, Cabellero and Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Austin v. Stanislaus County Superior Court
as 1:2020cv01449
Petitioner:
Steven Oscar Blackwell Austin
Respondent:
Stanislaus County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Blackwell v. Covello et al
as 2:2020cv01755
Defendant:
Patrick Covello and CDCR, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
Plaintiff:
Rodney Karl Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garland v. Eldridge et al
as 2:2020cv01061
Defendant:
Blackwell, C. Flores, Laura Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Darnell Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Blackwell v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2019cv09870
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Petitioner:
Ernest Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Vaden v. Mayes et al
as 2:2019cv02216
Defendant:
C. McPherson, Dr. Robert L. Mayes, Marcus Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Vaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
