Cases 1 - 10 of 200
SMITH v. BARRAZA et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM LATEEF RAKIM SMITH
Defendant:
CARLOS BARRAZA, BRIAN MCCARTHY, PATRICK CARMODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Alex Barraza
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tancredi v. Lara et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rosa Tancredi
Defendant:
Maria Lara, Gabriela Prado, Carol Lee Alvarez Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Tony Hines
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden Breitenbach, Robert Suwe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shay v. Barraza et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shay
Defendant:
Matthew Barraza, Michael Colby and Zachary Powell
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hogan v. Barraza, et al.
as 1:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Ejaunn C. Hogan
Defendant:
R Barraza, R Espinoa, Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barraza
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Chris Brady, Unknown Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hernandez-Barraza v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv02087
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez-Barraza
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv01309
Petitioner:
Camilo Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonilla Mesa v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv01209
Petitioner:
Jorge Y. Bonilla Mesa
Respondent:
L. Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
