Cases 1 - 10 of 17
COLEMAN v. ALICEA et al
as 1:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY ROBERT COLEMAN
Defendant:
A. ALICEA, Z. FAWVERS, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
BRADLEY ROBERT COLEMAN
Respondent:
D. REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLEMAN v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2021cv02460
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY ROBERT COLEMAN
Defendant:
ROBERTS, FUENTES, MCKITTRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv02488
Plaintiff:
AARON JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGLEY, JEFFREY SMITH, JEFFREY SHEARER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv01215
Plaintiff:
AARON JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGLEY, MARCIE GILMOUR, GEORGE BYERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley Lamb v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 14-14704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY ROBERT LAMB
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in individual and official capacity and TOMOKA CI WARDEN, in individual and official capacity
Lamb v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00744
Plaintiff:
Bradley Robert Lamb
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Warden, Tomoka Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goston v. Robert
as 1:2014cv00959
Petitioner:
James A Goston
Respondent:
Bradley Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olive v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv50235
Plaintiff:
Anthony Olive
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Lisa Weitekamp, Wexford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medley v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv01177
Plaintiff:
Joshua Medley
Defendant:
Salvadore Godinez, Bradley Robert, Dr Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
