Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. State Of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gilbert Beasley, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Georgia, Sandy Hodson and Attorney General Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Clarke v. Kimberly Esmond Adams, et al
as 22-14330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER CLARKE
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY M. ESMOND ADAMS, FANI T. WILLIS, CATHELENE TINA ROBINSON and others
Wyatt v. Wood et al
as 4:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Patrick Timothy Wyatt
Defendant:
Jon Bolling Wood, Herbert E. Buzz Franklin, Kim Windle James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell v. Carr
as 4:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Yusef Cantrell
Defendant:
Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Adams et al
as 1:2022cv04408
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Clarke
Defendant:
Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, Fani T. Willis, Cathelene Tina Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Eaton et al
as 1:2022cv04347
Plaintiff:
Danmond Jonathan Slack
Defendant:
Charles M. Eaton, Jr., Fani T. Willis, Cathelene "Tina" Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Carr
as 1:2022cv02892
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv02761
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Battle
Defendant:
Chris Carr, Paula K. Smith, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wymer v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv02295
Plaintiff:
James Wymer
Defendant:
Gov. Brain Kemp and AG Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
