Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Wellpath Corporation, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, LLC, Dr. Kevin Smith, Summer James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Darrell Cox, Sharon Hardin, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Regina
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Nurse Regina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. USA
as 6:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
James E. Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stephenson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Aaron Daniels, Darrell Cox, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
