Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Carroll v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Brandon Carroll
Respondent:
Judge Hendricks, Jailer Pennick, Logan County Circuit Court, Ky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Boyd et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Boyd, Christian County Jail, Wendall Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Todd County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. Phillips, Ryan Paul Phillips, Brandon Carroll and others
Defendant:
Todd County Jail, Jailor Jeff Pennick and Autor Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Gibbs et al
as 6:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Defendant:
Casey Gibbs, M. Carroll, Joseph Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Proctor et al
as 3:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Carroll County, Kentucky, Capt. Forlizzi and John Proctor
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Adams et al
as 5:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
Carroll Washington
Defendant:
Dr. Terre Adams and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carroll v. Kizziah et al
as 7:2018cv00077
Defendant:
J. Preston, Baker, S. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice et al
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Esteban DeJesus Lowery
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, Bowling Green Police Department, John D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Mink et al
as 6:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Donnie Hugh Carroll
Defendant:
Brad Mink and Laurel County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Carroll
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center and Jack Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
