Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chase v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv03321
Petitioner:
Christopher Chase
Respondent:
Elias Diggins and Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Gordy
as 1:2021cv00494
Petitioner:
Christopher Chase Hall
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMMOND v. ACERNO et al
as 2:2021cv03688
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAMMOND
Defendant:
THOMAS ACERNO, CHRISTOPHER CHASE, DAVID HELPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Marcantel
as 15-2017
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CHASE
Respondent - Appellee:
GREGG MARCANTEL, N.M. Secretary of Corrections
Chase v. Marcantel et al
as 1:2014cv00859
Petitioner:
Christopher Chase
Respondent:
Gregg Marcantel and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chase v. USA
as 1:2010cv00239
Petitioner:
Christopher Chase
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Chase v. Cox et al
as 1:2009cv02363
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chase
Defendant:
Mary Cox, Anthony DeCesaro and Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 09-2219
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CHASE
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Gary K. King
Chase v. Department of Corrections of t, et al
as 08-2210
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CHASE
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Secretary and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Chase v. Department of Corrections of the State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2008cv00377
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chase
Defendant:
Department of Corrections of the State of New Mexico and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
