Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GIBSON v. MACON STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
ARMOND GIBSON
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN TARMASHE SMITH, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHREY v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR HUMPHREY
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT, SERGEANT RONNESHA TULLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Santerelli
as 1:2021cv01135
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knight
Respondent:
Dale Santerelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knight v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2018cv01191
Petitioner:
Christopher Knight
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. Woosley et al
as 4:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew Christopher Knight
Defendant:
Roy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv00968
Petitioner:
Christopher Knight
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREEN v. JOHN DOE I et al
as 2:2011cv04877
Plaintiff:
MELVIN W. GREEN
Defendant:
RICHARD PAULLMAN, CARROLL FORREST, JUAN ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarter v. Knight et al
as 1:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Zevon McCarter
Defendant:
Christopher Knight and Gregory Bordenkitcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-36129
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vincent Rivera v. Michael Hayden, et al
as 10-14541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HAYDEN, Director Central Intel., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Asa Hutchinson, Secretary, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Electra Theo Corides, Exec. Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
