Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Williams v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Michael Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Hall, et al
as 23-55084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr., AKA Lonnie MoNique Williams Mootry
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY J. NIDORF JUVENILE HALL and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(PC) Williams-Mootry v. Benbrook et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Defendant:
P - Barker, S. Lickiss, C. Elston and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Mo'nique Williams-Mootry, Lonnie Clark Williams and Lonnie Mo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al. v. Heisner et al
as 1:2020cv07502
Defendant:
T. Miller, T. Holt-Nicholson, MacDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez, John Thompson, Fernando Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Awanata v. Nowakowski et al
as 1:2020cv07393
Defendant:
Clark Williams, Bonnie M Nowakowski, Andrew Kameros and others
Plaintiff:
Oya Awanata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 18-55284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R. OLSON, Correctional Counselor II and E. MARRERO
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 17-56802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R. OLSON, Correctional Counselor II and E. MARRERO
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 17-56437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R. OLSON, Correctional Counselor II and E. MARRERO
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07379
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLARK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Olsen et al
as 2:2016cv01072
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Clark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Olsen, E. Veater, G. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
