Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 67
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant: MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conwell v. Does
as 4:2023cv00438
Plaintiff: DeShawn Raymond Conwell
Defendant: John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conwell v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff: DeShawn Raymond Conwell
Defendant: Scott County Jail, Cedar County Jail and Cedar County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWELL v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00973
Petitioner: CHRIS CONWELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONWELL v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00972
Petitioner: CHRIS CONWELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONWELL v. WARDEN NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00816
Petitioner: CHRIS CONWELL
Respondent: WARDEN NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONWELL v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00740
Petitioner: CHRIS CONWELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONWELL v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00688
Petitioner: CHRIS CONWELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conwell v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03115
Plaintiff: Xavier Conwell
Defendant: Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conwell v. Cook County et al
as 1:2023cv01246
Plaintiff: Donald Conwell
Defendant: Cook County, Thomas J. Dart, Cermak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?