Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Logan v. Mississippi Dept of Corr
as 22-60172
Plaintiff / Appellant: Courtney R. Logan
Defendant / Appellee: Mississippi Department of Corrections, Haley Barbour, former governor, Nathan Burlcain and others
Logan v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00035
Defendant: Mississippi Dept of Corrections, John Doe, Haley Barbour and others
Plaintiff: Courtney R. Logan
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. State of Mississippi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00144
Respondent: State of Mississippi
Petitioner: Courtney R. Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Logan v. Phillips et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01094
Plaintiff: Courtney R. Logan
Defendant: Shawn Phillips, Ross, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Haslam et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00256
Plaintiff: Courtney R. Logan
Defendant: Bill Haslam , Mike W. Parris , Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff: Courtney R. Logan
Defendant: Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney Logan v. Bill Haslam, et al
as 17-5423
Petitioner - Appellant: COURTNEY R. LOGAN
Respondent - Appellee: BILL HASLAM, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., JOHN ZIMMERMAN and others
Logan v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2017cv00039
Plaintiff: Courtney R. Logan
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney Logan v. David Hopkins, et al
as 16-6819
Plaintiff - Appellant: COURTNEY R. LOGAN
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID MARTIN HOPKINS and COUNTY OF DAVIDSON
Courtney Logan v. John Does 1-4
as 16-6555
Plaintiff - Appellant: COURTNEY R. LOGAN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN DOES 1-4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?