Cases 1 - 10 of 10
White v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv03715
Defendant:
Ms. Williams, Giddel Salazar, David Burzenski and others
Plaintiff:
Larry A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough v. Early
as 1:2024cv03646
Respondent:
Curtis Earley
Petitioner:
Sammy Lee Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 8:2019cv01402
Plaintiff:
Bobby Thompson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Associate Warden Curtis Earley, Warden Scott Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Cartledge et al
as 4:2015cv04210
Plaintiff:
Ervin M Lopez
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Stephen Claytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starling v. Stirling et al
as 4:2015cv03636
Plaintiff:
Van Starling
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling , Michael McCall , Ms Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harley v. Stirling et al
as 0:2015cv02648
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harley
Defendant:
Bryant Stirling , Anthony Padula , Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harley v. Stirling et al
as 0:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harley
Defendant:
Bryant Stirling, Anthony Padula, Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Cartledge et al
as 4:2013cv01075
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Kaye A Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Giles v. Earley
as 0:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
James A Giles
Defendant:
Curtis Earley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
