Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Monderen v. Price et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kavin D. Price and Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM QUANTAVIOUS COBB
Defendant:
SHIFT COMMANDER HARRIETT L RICHARDSON, OFFICER J'SHON D PRICE, OFFICER GLORIA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. USA
as 4:2023cv00680
Petitioner:
Rodney D. Price
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Baker v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2022cv08447
Defendant:
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, County Of Westchester, Westchester Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Baker, Gail Baker and Eric Baker, By Guardian ad Litem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
Marcel D. Price
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Hartley et al
as 3:2022cv00775
Petitioner:
Marcel D. Price
Respondent:
James D. Hartley, Merrick Garland and Sean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01432
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Matthew R. Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
