Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isiah Hill v. ADOC, et al
as 22-15216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISIAH ROMONT HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, named as State Department of AZ Correction, CHARLES L. RYAN, Named as Former Director, C. Ryan, Sued Official/Individual, SLADE, C.O. #1777, Sued Official/Individual and others
Hill #068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01457
Plaintiff:
Isiah Hill
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, C Ryan, Unknown Slade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOORE v. PETTY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Defendant:
GARLAND, GIBBY, SGT. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2015cv00260
Defendant:
S. FISCHER, GARLAND, GIBBY and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2013cv00069
Defendant:
ADAMS, S. ARONLD, BARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL LEVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Defendant:
R. BROWN, DAVIS, M. GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL LEVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. FINNAN et al
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
SHAVAUGHN CARLOS WILSON
Defendant:
A. FINNAN, C.A. PENFOLD, S. KING and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaton v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Eaton
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
