Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jermaine Daniel Robinson v. Atascadero State Hospital
as 2:2022cv06835
Petitioner:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Respondent:
Atascadero State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Robinson v. Hurra et al
as 2:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
G. Hurra, D. Torres, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Robinson v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01595
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
L. Smith, J. Grove and E. Cotor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Robinson v. Atascadero State Hospital
as 2:2022cv01587
Petitioner:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Respondent:
Atascadero State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Robinson v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, W. Caruso, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv01990
Plaintiff:
Donald Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lowry v. Fearing et al
as 8:2016cv03164
Plaintiff:
William Edward Lowry
Defendant:
Kim Jones Fearing , Annette Hanson , Danielle Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Foster
as 2:2015cv01305
Petitioner:
Joevon Daniel Robinson
Respondent:
Brian Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Robinson
as 13-3283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RISHEEN DANIEL ROBINSON
Robinson v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in Criminal Case No. 10-40037 ONLY***
as 5:2013cv04099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Risheen Daniel Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
