Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vasquez v. Bascue et al
as 5:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
Pedro Daniel Vasquez
Defendant:
Kevin Bascue, Andrew Cavalier, Garden City Police Department, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID et al
as 4:2022cv03967
Plaintiff:
Victoriano Daniel Vasquez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. LaClair
as 18-2282
Petitioner - Appellant:
Daniel Vasquez
Respondent - Appellee:
Darwin LaClair, Superintendent; Franklin Correctional Facility
Cesar Vasquez-Morales v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16943
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESAR DANIEL VASQUEZ-MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Vasquez-Morales v. Ryan
as 2:2015cv01118
Petitioner:
Cesar Daniel Vasquez-Morales
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Enloe
as 1:2014cv09019
Petitioner:
Daniel Vasquez
Respondent:
D. Enloe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Dominquez v. Anthony Martinez, et al
as 14-11003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VASQUEZ DOMINQUEZ, also known as Daniel Vasquez Dominguez, also known as Daniel V. Dominguez
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY MARTINEZ, Food Service Manager, MARY BITELA, Correctional Officer, EDWARD CRANDALL, Correctional Officer and others
Dominquez v. Martinez et al
as 2:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vasquez Dominquez
Defendant:
Anthony Martinez, Mary Bitela, Edward Crandall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. LaClair
as 1:2013cv07373
Respondent:
Superintendent Darwin LaClair
Petitioner:
Daniel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasquez v. LaClair
as 1:2013cv07136
Respondent:
Darwin LaClair
Petitioner:
Daniel Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
