Cases 1 - 8 of 8
David Higdon v. Leon Malachinski, et al
as 17-17301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HIGDON, AKA David A. Higdon, AKA David Augustine Higdon
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON MALACHINSKI, MD, Resident Physician until 3/2016 at ASPC-Lewis Corizon, KYLE GEELAN, Dentist at ASPC-Lewis Corizon, TAMMI TAYLOR, Nurse Practitioner at ASPC-Lewis Rast Unit Corizon and others
Higdon #139953 v. Malachinski et al
as 2:2017cv02448
Plaintiff:
David Augustine Higdon
Defendant:
Leon Malachinski, Kyle Geelan, Tammi Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Napoli
as 13-131
Plaintiff:
Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Michael Doxen and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Defendant - Appellee:
David F. Napoli, Superintendent, Angela A. Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent, Marilyn Bridge, Deputy Superintendent and others
Medina v. Napoli
as 12-4558
Plaintiff:
Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Michael Doxen and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Defendant - Appellee:
David F. Napoli, Superintendent, Angela A. Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent, Marilyn Bridge, Deputy Superintendent and others
WILSON v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2011cv05568
Plaintiff:
LEROY ANTONIO WILSON
Defendant:
JULIO M. ALGARIN, DENNIS J. MOLYNEAUX, DAVID AUGUSTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Aderhold et al
as 11-1480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dwayne Moss
Defendant:
Donald Selsky
Defendant - Appellee:
S Doud, J Aderhold, T Harris and others
Moss v. Aderhold et al
as 6:2008cv06545
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Moss
Defendant:
J. Aderhold, S. Doud, T. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina et al v. Napoli et al
as 1:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Anthony Medina and others
Defendant:
David F. Napoli, Angela A. Bartlett, Marilyn Bridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
