Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton
as 3:2023cv04398
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
Federal Government, Federal Contractors and Military
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. Microsoft et al
as 2:2019cv02026
Defendant:
Community Behavioral Managment, Microsoft, Sponcors and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv01818
Defendant:
Community Behavioral Management, Mark Zuckerberg, Brad Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Stevens v. Carlton Powell, et al
as 18-11610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE JAMES STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF CARLTON POWELL, COMMANDER KEVIN LEE, AGENT BUDDY RHODEN and others
Charlie Stevens v. Carlton Powell, et al
as 16-12121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE JAMES STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLTON POWELL, KEVIN LEE, BUDDY RHODEN and others
STEVENS v. POWELL et al
as 7:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JAMES STEVENS
Defendant:
CARLTON POWELL, KEVIN LEE, BUDDY RHODEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves-Bey v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2015cv04638
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alexander Graves-Bey
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Edward Johnston, Sarah Jane Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillmar Patterson, Jr. v. Virginia Williams, et al
as 10-11992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILLMAR PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN RICHARDS, LOUIS SCHOFILL and others
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 7:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Floyd Wilson
Defendant:
Virginia Williams, Dr. Brown, Kevin Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
