Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Rice v. USA
as 3:2019cv03049
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rice v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv01026
Defendant:
Chris McConnell and USA
Plaintiff:
David Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICE v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2016cv01831
Petitioner:
DAVID RICE
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON , PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 1:2014cv01088
Defendant:
Sr Warden Edgar Baker, OIG Lieutenant Jerry Bell, Asst Warden L. Berger and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenton McGowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv01400
Plaintiff:
DAVID RICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas David Rice v. WVDC Facility Commander et al
as 5:2012cv01729
Defendant:
Jeffery Haga, Stephanie Morales, Stockton and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas David Rice
Joseph McGowen v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 12-20533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH KENTON MCGOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, RICK THALER, Director, Correctional Institutional Division, PAMELA WILLIAMS, Director of Support Services and others
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 4:2009cv03870
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenton McGowen
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler, Pamela Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Branum v. Johnson, et al
as 07-20312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED LEE BRANUM
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY JOHNSON, MARK LAUGHLIN, Warden, CAREY STAPLES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
