Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dudley v. Jones (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zulu v. Ivey et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Muzuz Mussun Ali Bamu Zulu and Milton Dudley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Karen Williams, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zulu v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Muzuz Mussun Ali Bamu Zulu and Milton Dudley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Karen Williams, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv08034
Petitioner:
Joshua Reshi Dudley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dudley v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Defendant:
Marlon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dwight R. Coleman, Robert Earl Jackson Little, Jason Daniels and others
Defendant:
Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00613
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton et al v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv00351
Plaintiff:
Damien Singleton , Michael James , Tony Gee and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S Dunn and DeWayne Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Officer Salter , Officer Dudley, Nurse Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
