Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Daniel Webster Johnson v. Unknown Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2023cv06583
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Johnson, II
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer, Attorney General and DPS Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel W. Johnson II v. Robert E. Record et al
as 2:2020cv08362
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Johnson, II
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer, Warden at CSP-LAC at Lancaster, Robert E. Record and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel W Johnson II v. Robert E Record
as 2:2020cv02883
Defendant:
Robert E Record
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Johnson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Wright v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Wright
Defendant:
J. Lewis, Shama Chaiken, D. Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Fields, et al
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Wright
Defendant:
D. Fields and C. Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Webster Johnson II v. Robert E Record et al
as 2:2011cv10001
Defendant:
Yolanda De La Torre, Yolanda De La Torre, Edward Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Johnson, II
Cundiff v. Webster et al
as 1:2011cv01840
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Cundiff
Respondent:
Daniel Webster and Kathleen Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Hill v. Correctional Medical Services,
as 08-7670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WEBSTER HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, TIFFANY BENNETT and TRICIA BAKER, CMS/Rep
Hill v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv03060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Hill
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Tricia Baker and Tiffany Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
