Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Freeman, III v. Nolan
as 15-2002
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FREEMAN, III
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID NOLAN
Rivera v. Nolan
as 09-1333
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS F. RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID NOLAN, Superintendent
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, Commissioner, JAMES R. BENDER, Assistant Deputy Commissioner, TIMOTHY HALL, Assistant Deputy Commissioner and others
Bly v. Nolan
as 08-2537
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY BLY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID NOLAN, Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction
Baggett et al v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv40224
Plaintiff:
Michael Baggett
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy, Deval L. Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conboy v. The Town of Ocean City, Maryland et al
as 1:2008cv02367
Plaintiff:
David Nolan Conboy
Defendant:
The Town of Ocean City, Maryland, Bernadette De Pino, Vicki Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conboy v. Warden
as 1:2008cv02015
Petitioner:
David Nolan Conboy
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DuPont v. Nolan
as 08-1710
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL KEVIN DUPONT
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID NOLAN
Fowlkes v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv12009
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Kathleen M. Dennehy, James R. Bender, Timothy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niemic v. Galas, et al
as 07-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH NIEMIC
Defendant:
DAVID NOLAN, MICHAEL MALONEY, Former Commissioner of Corrections, PETER ALLEN, Former Superintendent of MCI Cedar Junction and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN GALAS, Health Service Administrator-MCI Cedar Junction, KARA ERDODY, Nurse Practitioner-MCI Cedar Junction, DONALD KERN DR. DONALD KERN, Director Health Services-MCI Cedar Junction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
