Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Kimble v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2021cv00409
Defendant:
Darren Parent, East Baton Rouge Parish, 24th Judicial District Attorney Office and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harold Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumpkin v. Deroche et al
as 2:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lumpkin
Defendant:
J Deroche and C Burger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoder v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2020cv12992
Defendant:
Midland County, Scott Stevenson, Jakob Stillwell and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Yoder
Kimble v. Moore et al
as 3:2020cv00708
Defendant:
David Deroche, John Doe, Darrent Parent and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2019cv13078
Defendant:
David Deroche, Edward Olsen, C Silbernagel and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harold Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Lexus of New Orleans et al
as 2:2018cv07918
Defendant:
Lexus of New Orleans, Victor J. Woods, Jr., Jefferson Parish Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 2:2018cv11739
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie-Lamar et al v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2018cv11663
Plaintiff:
Deandre Currie-Lamar, Tyrone Price, Keithon Porter and others
Defendant:
Scott Stephenson, Amy Randall, Jeffrey Derocher and others
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 1:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv03063
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Superintendant Yoksoulian, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
