Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Williams v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriff Whitehorn and Rick Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden of Bennettsville FCI
as 5:2024cv00585
Petitioner:
Marshall DeWayne Williams
Respondent:
Warden of Bennettsville FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14232
Petitioner:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Marshall Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13759
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2023cv00586
Petitioner:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gerry Dewayne Williams v. Sergeant McNeal et al
as 2:2023cv07292
Plaintiff:
Gerry Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Sergeant McNeal, Camacho, A. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center
as 5:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Mgr Fredieu, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Romona Emanuel, Caddo Correctional Center, Dr Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-10275
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv06151
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Rick Farris, M Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
